18001 standards pdf

Does the review address possible need to change its policy, objectives and other elements of the OSH management system? Has this been conducted in light of OSH management system audit results, continual improvement and changing circumstances? Does the record of the review include a list of information used for the management evaluation?

Click below to download the check sheet and requirements. Is the scope of the program clearly defined? How long has the program been established? Does the policy include a commitment to compliance to legal requirements? Is the policy available to interested parties?

Does the procedure cover routine and non routine activities? Does the procedure cover all personnel and facilities? Do the criteria for the assessment of risk address both likelihood and consequence?

Are there records to provide evidence of analysis of hazards, risks and controls? Are there any obvious hazards that should have been considered and were not? If not, why not?

Does the methodology: define scope, nature and timing? Has the organization established and maintained OSH objectives? Have the documented objectives considered legal and other requirements? Are objectives reasonable and measurable? Is there a documented and maintained procedure for periodically reviewing objectives? Are objectives communicated to the employees that are supposed to achieve them?

Are there programs to achieve all the identified objectives? Do the programs assign responsibilities for completion of tasks in achieving objectives?

Are the management programs reviewed at planned intervals and amended as required? Are roles and responsibility, and authorities defined, documented and communicated? Has the organization appointed an OSH management appointee from top management? Are procedures established and maintained to make employees aware of a — d above? How do you ensure personnel are competent to perform tasks that impact OHS?

Has the appropriate training been done and, where required, by qualified trainers? How are communications to and from interested parties documented? How are employees involved in the development of policies and procedures to manage risks? How are employees consulted for changes that affect workplace health and safety? How are employees represented on OHS matters? How are OHS representatives involved in communication mechanisms with management?

What initiatives do you have to encourage OHS consultations and improvement activities? How does the organization show linkage between all upper and lower level documentation? Are there maintained procedures to identify potential for accidents and emergency situations?

Are there maintained procedures to respond to accidents and emergency situations? Are there periodical tests of the above procedures? Do the procedures address qualitative and quantitative measures? Are monitoring of OSH objectives performed? Are OSH performance indicators evaluated for corrective and preventative action? Are the indicators of OSH performance communicated to management? Are the records for the calibrations and maintenance results retained?

Are appropriate corrective and preventive actions taken? Are the results of the corrective and preventive actions implemented and recorded? Are the records legible, identifiable and traceable to the activities involved? Are there specified retention times for all of the records identified? Is consideration given to confidentially? Are procedures documented and maintained for periodic OSH audits? Does the OSH audit provide results of the audits to management?

Does the procedure address the independence of auditors? Does the review address the systems? First, the corporate sustainability requirements were identified based on Corporate Sustainability Index, Ethos Indicators and Global Reporting Initiative. Next, the matrix that lists the sustainability and standards requirements was built. The matrix was completed by the researcher and six experts. The responses were consolidated generating the Consolidated Relation Matrix, which was then analyzed and interpreted.

The correlations were classified as strong, moderate, weak or null. The study concluded that these regulatory standards can help companies to introduce sustainability in their context, however, ISO and OHSAS are standards that approach only some elements of corporate sustainability.

The NBR is the standard with more elements of sustainability in its scope. Thus, companies aiming to introduce sustainability into corporate environments could focus on the implementation of the NBR. Resumo: A sustentabilidade pode ser inserida no contexto empresarial como uma forma de minimizar impactos causados pelos processos produtivos.

A matriz foi preenchida pela pesquisadora e por mais seis especialistas. In this context, sustainable Rocha et al. However, development is seen as an alternative to help solve no studies that indicated the relationship between environmental, social and economic problems, which these management system standards and corporate encompass global issues e. Therefore, to fill this gap specific regional problems e. In the business context, sustainability is regarded as 2 Theoretical foundation This subject will present the theoretical basis of [ The first version of the ISO standard was published in and was later revised in , With the accelerated industrialization process in , and The ISO standard the s, entrepreneurs believed that environmental specifies quality management requirements based damage should be borne by society at large in on a management system model Carpinetti, The industrial The model is based on the principles of total quality pollutants were discharged as far as possible from management which includes: customer focus, the pollution source Barbieri, In the s leadership, involvement of individuals, process a new relationship between the environment and approach, systemic management approach, continuous economic development was sought, this was observed improvement, decision-making based on facts and through government corrective and low efficiency mutually beneficial supplier relationships Vitoreli actions.

After the Rio concluded that the members of ISO 92 the strategic approach to preventing pollution certified companies believed improved business began Barbieri, ISO , which determines the requirements The study by Zeng et al. In the ABNT of responsibility, improvements in teamwork, launched the NBR ISO standard, for the improved internal management, increase customer implementation of the Management System of Social confidence, increased market share, increase profits Responsibility.

Analysis of the relationship between management system standards This is an international standard that programs, according to the proposed issues. They concluded that the main factors these a number of organizational performance indicators organizations adopted ISO standards are related e. The study sample consisted of strategic choice on how to deal with environmental Spanish companies in which the model developed issues. The authors Heras-Saizarbitoria et al. Given this context, the analyzed Spanish companies and conducted a study authors concluded that the implementation of an to analyze the motivations and the benefits obtained by occupational safety and health management system can ISO certified companies.

They concluded that reduce accidents and personal injury rates, improves companies that adopt this certification, considering working conditions, increases employee motivation, the internal factors, have greater benefits compared reduces absenteeism, improves image and business with those who seek certifications considering only reputation, influences productivity and innovation external factors.

A study conducted in Japan, which estimated the effects of the ISO certification in supply 2. The report presents three fundamental practices Arimura et al. Furthermore, companies developed by Elkington emerged, known as triple that implement the ISO achieve competitive bottom line, which considers social, environmental advantages and higher financial returns compared to and economic issues. Social Pillar: The author states that the degree of The NBR is a Brazilian standard subject to trust between the organizations and their stakeholders is certification created by the Brazilian Association of an important factor to achieve long-term sustainability.

Technical Standards in conjunction with other parts. In addition, the social costs should be entered in the Its first version was launched in and revised in accounting. The study by education, relationship with the surrounding community, Soratto et al. The concept behind the economic consumers and customers, community, government and social pillars brings forth issues such as business and society Ethos, In the context of sustainability there is corporate sustainability aspect, based on economic a need for companies to develop an accounting model efficiency, environmental balance, social justice and to enter the environmental and social accountability.

Bovespa, The capital of a company is composed of corporate sustainability best practices and support physical capital e. Initiative GRI.

GRI, , p. The idea between the indicators that can be used by companies that want environmental and social pillars includes the issues to achieve a higher level of maturity regarding related to environmental injustice, where people sustainability.

Therefore, these documents were the are disadvantaged due to environmental problems. These changes in ideas Initiative GRI. The tool consists of a questionnaire, where satisfy the aspirations of stakeholders and thereby companies can perform management self-diagnosis become sustainable. The indicators sustainability were identified. Moreover, sustainability can sustainability requirements Chart 1. Therefore an be measured in organizations by using sustainability exploratory literature review was carried on the subject indicators such as those described in the Corporate out and it identified that there is a range of studies Sustainability Index, the Ethos Indicators and the that address the issue of corporate sustainability.

Global Reporting Initiative. The researchers considered three documents that point to the main sustainability indicators which can be used 3 Methodology by companies striving to achieve a higher level of maturity regarding this matter.

The steps are as follows Figure 1 : exploratory literature review most important indicators of corporate sustainability. ABNT, , p. The requirements were listed and included in the lines of Theoretical Relationship Matrix.

The selection of management system standards used in the study followed the following criteria: 3. The scale used in the relationships was Figure 1. Development Method of Relationship Matrix. Prepared by the authors. Chart 1. Issues addressed in corporate sustainability requirements. Engagement and Occupational dialogue policies with Commitment of senior Health and Safety stakeholders Ethos, management with social and Policy Ethos, Environmental Communication policy and ISE, Permanent environmental issues Ethos, and ISE, Improvement Ethos, Ethos, Value diversity, equity Preparation of Ethical stance Ethos, and non-discrimination ISE, ISE, Incorporation of socio- labor, compensation, Waste Management Ethos, , ISE, Competition Legal Reserve environmental criteria in the benefits and career Ethos, Identify stakeholders and GRI, Defense ISE, Monitoring timber Ethos, and ISE, 3.

Social Responsibility in Corporate risk Environmental License ISE, and inputs Ethos, Communicate socio- GRI, Preventive policies Dialogue with and ISE, Climate change environmental aspects to Policies related Ethos, Engagement of Derivative financial ISE, Environmental quality , ISE, and stakeholders Ethos, instruments Environmental policy Social responsibility in the , ISE, Ethos, GRI, Final destination of the Monitor the impacts of 5.

Participation of public Monitoring indirect Working product Ethos, Biodiversity Evaluation of suppliers conditions Ethos, Reduce consumption Ethos, Person responsible 6. Sponsorship of Management of and ISE, Ethos, Area or committee Prepare socio-environmental Dialogue with Performance environment Training suppliers on , ISE, Environmental and ISE, Vulnerable groups Management Ethos, No action for unfair Ethos, Study of Ethos, and ISE, Inclusion of local Product life cycle competition Ethos, 8.

Ethical principles Competition Environmental Impact Monitoring significant Compliance with laws 9. Human Rights GRI, Financial Emergency plan Ethos, Career Planning of statements in constant Ethos, Support educational projects Mapping skills Ethos, and ISE, Monitoring risks and Ethos,